title: |
Improving performances in a company when collective strategy comes up against individual interests |
|
publication: |
||
part of series: |
Advances in Intelligent Systems Research | |
| pages: | 904 - 911 | |
DOI: |
To be assigned soon (how to use a DOI) | |
author(s): |
Abdelhak Imoussaten |
|
publication date: |
July 2011 |
|
keywords: |
industrial performances, argumentation, multi
criteria improvement, debate modelling, qualitative model. |
|
abstract: |
In the current industrial context, strategies intended to
bring about continuous improvement have to include the
multi-criteria performance expression aspects. In complex
systems, many actions may be envisaged to achieve the
required levels of performance. A fuzzy representation is
used to model the relationships between objectives and
actions. Mostly, the potential improvement actions are
distributed into several departments of a company. Then,
the departments have to enter into negotiations to allocate
actions responsibility and share the budget granted by the
direction. Lots of interest conflicts may occur. An
argumentation framework is proposed to model this
argumented negotiation for improvement design. |
|
copyright: |
©
Atlantis Press. This article is distributed under the
terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited. |
|
full text: |